<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>L2's on Ethereum Market Research Center</title><link>https://ethmrc.com/tags/l2s/</link><description>Recent content in L2's on Ethereum Market Research Center</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 20:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ethmrc.com/tags/l2s/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>L1 Validators vs. Ethereum L2’s: Cost Comparison for Chain Operators</title><link>https://ethmrc.com/l1-validators-vs-ethereum-l2s-cost-comparison-for-chain-operators/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 20:24:03 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://ethmrc.com/l1-validators-vs-ethereum-l2s-cost-comparison-for-chain-operators/</guid><description>&lt;p>This report compares the operational on-chain costs of launching an alternative Layer-1 (“alt-L1”) blockchain versus building an Ethereum Layer-2 (L2) with respect to validator rewards, data availability (DA), and zero-knowledge (ZK) proof costs. Alt-L1s support security via decentralized validators: they incur costs through token issuance and sharing transaction fees or MEV. These validator expenditures vary greatly depending on the chain’s token model and price. L2s, in contrast, inherit Ethereum’s settlement security; their major on-chain expense is paying for data posted to Ethereum (data availability) plus, if using ZK rollups, additional proof generation costs.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>